Legal Opinion

United States v. Daye

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 25, 1983No. CM 442506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NAUGHTON, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of attempted larceny and larceny in violation of Articles 80 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 921. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for nine months and forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for nine months. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant has raised three assignments of error for our consideration, but only one warrants discussion. Relying on United States v. Williams,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. LockwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MauckU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. MillerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. MaturaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. AskewU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API