Legal Opinion
Kyle v. Apollomax, LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-152-RGAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:
Ronald Kyle (“Plaintiff” or “Kyle”) initiated this action against Michael O’Neill (“Mr. O’Neill), Apollomax, LLC, and O’Neill, LLC d/b/a O’Neill Innovations (collectively, the “Defendants”) on February 8, 2012. (D.I.l). On November 14, 2012, Kyle filed an Amended Complaint asserting four causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, breach of the Operating Agreement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.1 (D.I.104). The Defendants filed the instant motion for summary judgment on May 17, 2013. (D.I.171). The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nemec v. ShraderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brunswick TKTKonnect, LLC v. KavanaughDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Chen Fang v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48 LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- DNA Comprehensive Therapy Services, LLC d/b/a Elite DNA Behavioral Health v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Horsman v. CooneyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Lauk v. Solera Global Holding Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.