Eubanks v. State

Miller, Judge.

Convicted of possession of cocaine, Darrell Eubanks challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. Because the State proved he was near the cocaine and possessed drug paraphernalia, and because he failed to include a transcript of the new trial hearing on appeal, we affirm.

1. Citing a lack of evidence, Eubanks claims the court erred in denying his motions for new trial and for a directed verdict. The test *797established in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), applies to our review of both rulings. Humphrey v.…