Legal Opinion
Szymkus v. Eureka Fire & Marine Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 9, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,341PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action of assumpsit upon insurance policy. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October t.erm, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellant sued the appellees, the Eureka Fire -& Marine Insurance Company and the Security Insurance Company, on a policy of insurance against fire issued to appellant by said companies. The case was tried by the court and a jury; the jury found the issues for the appellees, and the court, after overruling a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment on the verdict.
The policy is as follows :
“ By this policy of insurance the Eureka Fire & Marine Insurance Co. and the Security Insurance Company of the City of Cincinnati, State of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Commercial Insurance v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Norwaysz v. Thuringia InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Aurora Fire Insurance v. EddyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Reaper City Insurance v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Maringer v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Clute v. Clintonville Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Saathoff v. Country Mutual Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008