Legal Opinion

Flemister v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Criminal law. Evidence. Demurrer. Practice. "Witness. Charge of court. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Eulton superior court. March- term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Elemister was indicted by the grand jury of Eulton county for the offence of perjury. On the trial of the case, he was found guilty. He made a motion for a new trial, on the several grounds therein, which motion was overruled by the court; whereupon he excepted.

1. The main ground insisted upon before us by counsel for the plaintiff in error was, that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. He insisted that there was not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of Mrs. Martin, the prosecutrix, to authorize the jury to convict. We have carefully read the testimony sent up in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. PopwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Griffin v. Justices of the Inferior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. Taylor v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Gravitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate ExchangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Simpkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API