Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 2, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffoRds, J.

After remand of this cause from the Supreme Court of the United States, where our judgment for the defendant, upon the ground that defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been granted (see 113 Vt 8, 28 A2d 639), was reversed, that Court being of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the question whether the defendant was negligent in failing to use reasonable care in furnishing plaintiff’s intestate with a safe place to work, the defendant was given leave to further argue such of its exceptions as were not disposed of in our former opinion or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  2. Houghton v. LeinwohlSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. Jackson v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  4. Wakefield v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  5. Costa v. Volkswagen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API