Legal Opinion

PLOURDE v. CEJKA

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 9, 2024No. 1:19-cv-00486Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GLEN PLOURDE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-00486-JAW ) MAINE STATE POLICE ) TROOPER ROBERT CEJKA ) and MAINE STATE POLICE ) TROOPER ERIC VERHILLE, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Having concluded that an initial traffic stop was lawful, that a canine sniff of the exterior of the plaintiff’s vehicle was not a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, that the canine sniff did not unreasonably prolong the traffic stop, and that once the canine alerted to something inside the vehicle, law enforcement officers…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API