Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Noah
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1917No. 6903PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from District Court, Bryan County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by Rogers Noah against J. S. Mullen and others. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants -bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
On October 28, 1909, Rogers Noah, a full-blood Choctaw Indian, executed an agricultural lease on his restricted surplus allotment to one J. S. Mullen. Said lease in part is as follows:
“That the party of the 'first part, for and in consideration, of $200.00, paid and to be paid as hereinbefore provided, hereby lets and leases unto the party of the second part, for a period of five years beginning June 1st, 1910, •and ending October 20th, 1914, the following described land, etc. * * Í and the said consideration exclusive of the improvements to be placed on said land for each of said years,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Allen v. DodsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Harjo v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Johnson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Davis v. RobedeauxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Naylor v. Eastman Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.