Dragovich v. United States Department of the Treasury
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE BLAG’S AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. Ill, 116 and 117)
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of § 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act *946(DOMA), 1 U.S.C. § 7, and § 7702B(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 7702B(f), to the extent that these statutes limit Plaintiffs’ participation in a long-term care insurance program maintained by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). Plaintiffs contend that these federal provisions…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Windsor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Sevcik v. SandovalDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Windsor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Windsor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.