Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 25, 1984No. 05-83-00223-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

We grant the State’s motion for rehearing and withdraw our former opinion. This is now our opinion.

Calvin Earl Arnold appeals his conviction of aggravated rape and his enhanced sentence of fifteen years. In four grounds of error, he contends that the trial court erred in limiting his right of cross-examination; in seating the jury when his counsel was absent; and in denying his motion to quash the indictment for lack of notice and for failure to allege an essential element of the offense charged. We overrule all grounds and affirm the conviction.

In his first ground of error,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Brem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Hilliard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Huerta, Guadencio v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Markle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API