Dike v. Drexel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Herman S. Dike, as receiver of Edward M. Field and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, composing the firm of Drexel, Morgan & Co., entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of July, 1895, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, P. J.:
The appellant is the receiver of the copartnership of Field, Lindley, Wiechers & Co., who, during the year 1891, carried on business as bankers and brokers in the city of Hew York. The individual members of the firm were Edward M. Field, Daniel A. Lindley, John F. Wiechers and Herman C. Hilmers. The copartnership was formed in April, 1891, and was the successor of the firm of Field, Lindley & Co., of which latter firm said Edward M. Field and Daniel A. Lindley had been members. The firm of Field, Lindley & Co. was indebted to the firm of Drexel, Morgan *79& Co., the respondents on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Justh v. . Nat. B'k of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bernheimer v. . RindskopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Sterling v. JaudonNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rochester & Charlotte Turnpike Road Co. v. PaviourNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Cluett v. CoutureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- People v. BrandonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- State Bank v. BacheNew York Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.