Legal Opinion

People v. Van Stuyvesant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was deprived of his right to testify before the grand jury was properly denied. In his initial motion papers, defen*560dant conceded that he had not served notice of intent to testify, and his claim that the People had been provided with actual notice of his intent was unsupported.

While defendant claims that his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rice v. Penguin Putnam, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KowallisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Stuyvesant v. Melissa Ann Crane J.S.CDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  3. Whittingham v. TressDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API