Legal Opinion
Rice v. Penguin Putnam, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 2002PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
2Cited by21 opinions
- Baron v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Nelson v. StanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.