Legal Opinion

Biddulph v. Mortham

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 1996No. 95-3131PublishedCited by 67 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

I. Introduction

Appellant Dave Biddulph is a proponent of “Voter Approval of New Taxes,” an initiative proposal to amend the Florida Constitution to prohibit the imposition of any new state or local taxes except upon voter approval. Appellant Tax Cap Committee (“Tax Cap”), formed by Biddulph, is the initiative proposal’s official sponsor committee. “Voter Approval of New Taxes” was ultimately excluded from the ballot for failure to comply with Florida requirements governing the substance and titles of amendments proposed by initiative. Appellants contend that Florida’s initiative process…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Voting for America, Inc. v. John SteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Long v. Shorebank Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Stan Dobrovolny Kent Bernbeck Richard Bellino v. Scott A. Moore, Individually and Officially, Secretary of State for the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API