Legal Opinion

Friemel v. Coker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1920No. 1583PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Deaf Smith County; Reese Tatum, Judge. Suit by J. C. Coker against E. J. Friemel. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by ap-pellee, Coker, against appellant, Friemel, to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the failure of Friemel to properly cultivate certain lands leased by Coker to Frie-mel, under a crop-sharing rental contract. Coker also sought to recover the value of his share of the crop that was raised, alleging that Friemel had permitted same to be eaten by his cattle. He also sought to recover damages to the land caused by trespass thereon of Friemel’s cattle. A preliminary injunction against Friemel permitting his cattle to graze on said farm land was issued; and on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Moore v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gorman v. BrazeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Morgan v. TimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Cotton Growers Ass'n v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Mason v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Beckville Independent School District v. Tatum Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Turner v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API