Legal Opinion

Brownwell Corporation v. Ginsky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 34,121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff filed its bill in the circuit court for the county of Wayne in chancery to reform the description in a land contract between it and defendants. Defendants appeared and filed an answer admitting error in the description and consenting to the correction, and by way of cross-bill in their answer prayed for rescission of the contract alleging many breaches of its terms. On motion of plaintiff, an order was made requiring that defendants pay into court all sums then due under the terms of the contract, the sums to become due as they matured, and the future taxes and assessments.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Carnahan v. CarnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Belting v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. North v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Swarthout v. LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. American Construction & Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. American Oil Co. v. SuhonenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. American Oil Co. v. SuhonenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API