Legal Opinion

Maine Eye Care Associates P.A. v. Gorman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Timber H. Gorman appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kenne-bec County, Studstrup, J.), entered upon remand from this Court, finding for Maine Eye Care Associates, P.A. (MECA) on its claims against Gorman alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment and awarding MECA damages. Gorman argues that the findings of fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment lack adequate support in the record. 1 We vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts, found by the court during the jury-waived trial and incorporated by reference in its judgment on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Dombkowski v. FerlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Mariello v. GiguereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Maine Eye Care Associates P.A. v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Wayne Knope v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Estate of MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. In re Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API