Legal Opinion
Jones v. Director, Patuxent Institution
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 1, 1972No. Civ. A. 70-1061-WPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
OPINION AND ORDER
Petitioner, presently a patient at Patuxent Institution, Jessup, Maryland, seeks habeas corpus relief in this Court.
Two petitions were submitted to this Court requesting relief for Jones. The petition as submitted by Jones, pro se, alleged two conviction issues — tainted identification and prejudicial remarks— along with numerous claims pertaining to his confinement. The petition submitted on Jones’ behalf by the Legal Aid Bureau did not refer to any confinement issues but rather was limited to the conviction issues just stated. On January 3, 1972, the…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HorneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Gaines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. HatrakDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Mendes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Weems v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.