Legal Opinion
Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 26, 2013No. 13-1144PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation (“Conestoga”), Norman Hahn, Elizabeth Hahn, Norman Lemar Hahn, Anthony Hahn, and Kevin Hahn (collectively, “the Hahns”) appeal from an order of the District Court denying their motion for a preliminary injunction. In their Complaint, Appellants allege that regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), which require group health plans and health insurance issuers to provide coverage for contraceptives, violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb (“RFRA”) and the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cyril Korte v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Elane Photography, LLC v. WillockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Gilardi v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.