State ex rel. Roberts v. State

| denied. Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. In addition, relator’s claims regarding the denial of a continuance and the improper questioning of a juror were addressed on appeal. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A); see also State v. Roberts, 12-1555 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/26/13), 116 So.3d 754.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow…