Legal Opinion

Hulin v. . Tel. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action for damages, tried upon the following issues:

"1. Did the defendant negligently fail to transmit and deliver the telegram from Troy, N.C. as alleged in the complaint? Answer: `Yes.'
"2. Did the defendant negligently fail to deliver a service message to the sender, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: `Yes.'
"3. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: `$1,250.'"

Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. This case was before us at the Fall Term, 1921, and is reported in 182 N.C. 541. A new trial having been granted on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Barnes v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Alexander v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Hulin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowles Automotive, Inc. v. North Carolina Division of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API