Legal Opinion

Eva Jimenez-Sandoval v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2022No. 19-73193Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EVA ANGELINA JIMENEZ- No. 19-73193 SANDOVAL, Petitioner, Agency No. A072-991-558 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted September 2, 2021* San Francisco, California Filed January 13, 2022 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone,** District Judge. Opinion by Judge Rawlinson * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Kurniawan Salim v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Jose Flores-Chavez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. MEJIA-ANDINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API