Legal Opinion

State v. Harry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1924No. 17808PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants, Harry and Jennie Greenwald, were charged with, and upon trial in the superior court for King county, sitting with a jury, were found guilty of, being jointists, in that they conducted a place in that county for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. Judgments being accordingly rendered against them, both have appealed to this court, bringing here in the clerk’s transcript the instructions to the jury given by the court, but no state*160ment of facts or bill of exceptions advising us as to wbat evidence was produced upon the trial or as to what occurred at the trial.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Brown Bros. & Co. v. Forest, Washington Territory1867
  5. Mauseth v. SlaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Staples v. EsaryWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. PlaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API