Libby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
These cases are before us upon reports from a judge of the Superior Court which present the single question, whether after rescripts from this court ordering judgments for the defendant under the provisions of G. L. c. 231, § 122, he had authority to allow amendments in the cases. , The judge ruled that he was without authority. He stated that if he had discretion in the matter he would allow amendment. Before the day on which judgments after rescript would enter in ordinary course pursuant to Common Law Rule 56 of the Superior Court (1923), the cases were continued for judgment pending final…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Gale v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Burke v. HodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lewis v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Chesler v. NobilioMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1936
- Glennie v. Alfred Sears Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933