In re Moore
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, Judge
These two appeals from separate decisions of the Patent Office Board of Appeals were argued on the same day, considered together and will *1343be disposed of in a single opinion. The issue we find determinative in both appeals is whether an antedating affidavit must include therein a showing of prior discovery of a utility for a particular chemical compound, in order to be effective in removing a reference against a claim to that compound or the method for its production, where the reference describes the compound and how to make it but fails to disclose a utility therefor, no utility being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Eric D. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re WafmouthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In Re Enhanced Security Research, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Union Oil Co. of California v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1998