Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a chancery decree in a declaratory judgment suit holding there was no coverage under an automobile liability policy.

In June, 1981, the Plaintiff-Appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, issued a standard automobile liability policy to the Defendants, Virgil A. Fisher and Betty S. Fisher, residents of Salem, Virginia. As pertinent here, the policy provides coverage to a non-owned automobile for “any relative” of the named insured. It defines a relative as “any relative of the named insured who is a resident of the same household.”…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. PulsiferDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1941
  4. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gredig v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. McDonough v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Johnson v. BartleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Gredig v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API