Legal Opinion

Axt v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 17, 1942No. 486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

Defendant issued to plaintiff a robbery insurance policy which indemnified assured against loss to the amount of $1,000 where the robbery occurred “within the assured’s premises”, and to the amount of $10,000 where the robbery occurred from the custody of a custodian “outside the assured’s premises”.

The policy contained the following definition: “ ‘PREMISES’ as used in this Policy shall mean the interior of that portion of the building designated in Item 3 of the Declarations which is occupied solely by the Assured in conducting his business.” Under Item 3 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Frozine v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lewis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Hydro Electric Company, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Rhode Island CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. Siegman v. Orion Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API