Nationwide Insurance v. Costa
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant costs and disbursements pursuant to NRS 18.020. Appellant filed a timely opening brief, but respondents have not filed an answering brief.
On February 11, 1983, we ordered respondents to show cause why their failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error pursuant to NRAP 31(c). Respondents have neither filed a brief nor responded to our order to show cause.
Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondents’ conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see also Smith v. Smith, 98 *158Nev. 395, 649 P.2d…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Gavin v. RhodenNevada Supreme Court · 1981
4Cited by1 opinion
- Bates v. ChronisterNevada Supreme Court · 1984