Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance v. Costa

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1983No. 14296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant costs and disbursements pursuant to NRS 18.020. Appellant filed a timely opening brief, but respondents have not filed an answering brief.

On February 11, 1983, we ordered respondents to show cause why their failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error pursuant to NRAP 31(c). Respondents have neither filed a brief nor responded to our order to show cause.

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondents’ conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see also Smith v. Smith, 98 *158Nev. 395, 649 P.2d…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gavin v. RhodenNevada Supreme Court · 1981

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. ChronisterNevada Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API