Legal Opinion

Slowinski v. County of Monmouth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 15, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Joseph P. Slowinski and Stacey C. Slowinski, filed an action in the Chancery Division to enjoin defendant, County of Monmouth, from implementing a road-widening of County Route 587 which passes in fi*ont of plaintiffs’ eighteenth-century home. Defendant was granted summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal the grant of summary judgment to the County, as well as the denial of plaintiffs’ own motion for summary judgment. We affirm these rulings.

Plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint on August 25, 1990, seeking to restrain defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan TrustSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Callano v. Oakwood Park Homes Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Devins v. Borough of BogotaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Valentine v. LamontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills v. BowmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API