Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Royal Park No. 14, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 28, 1992No. 3:92-CV-0513-TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MALONEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs July 7, 1992, Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants responded to the motion on August 17, 1992. Plaintiff replied on September 14, 1992. The court, having considered the motion, response, reply, and competent summary judgment evidence, is of the opinion that Plaintiffs motion should be granted.
BACKGROUND
This dispute involves Defendants’ alleged default on a promissory note and related guaranty and deed of trust executed in favor of the Bank of Dallas. On February 5,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Favero v. Huntsville Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Royal Park No. 14, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Asarkasaamsu v. United StatesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2024