Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Tewes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The plaintiff has brought an action for partition, alleging in his complaint that he and others are “ seized in fee and possessed of the premises hereinbefore described, as tenants in common.” The motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was denied.

*294The property in question, together with personal estate, was owned in her lifetime by Elisabeth Tewes. By her last will and testament she provided for the payment of debts and the investment of a trust fund of $1,000 for a grandchild, to be deposited in some savings bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morse v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Chamberlain v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. McDonald v. . O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Hubbard v. HousleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Brooklyn Trust Co. v. KernanNew York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deegan v. DeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of CallisterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of LockwoodNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API