Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Housley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by Mitchell A. 0. Levy, the purchaser herein, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 26th day of April, 1899, requiring him to complete his purchase of nremises sold' at a partition sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J..:

The action was brought for the partition of certain property in the city of Hew York, and judgment was entered directing a sale. Accordingly the referee oil the 11th day of January, 1899, sold the premises for the sum of $23,600. It was arranged that the title should be closed and the deed delivered on the 10th of February, 1899. Immediately after the sale the purchaser took possession of the premises and advertised them for sale, and he continued in possession of the premises until his final refusal to carry the purchase into effect. The sale was adjourned from- time to time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Cooke v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Frantz v. IrelandNew York Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lane v. CorwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Russell v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Brooklyn Trust Co. v. KernanNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In re the Petition of BarthenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  5. O'Hara v. TewesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API