Legal Opinion
Einstein v. Schnebly
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided August 16, 1898No. 771PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Opinion of the court on demurrer to the amended bill of complaint, motion that parts of said bill be made more certain, and application for receiver.
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
This is a suit for the dissolution and winding up of the affairs of a partnership, and for the appointment, in the meantime, of a receiver. The bill alleges as follows:
That on March 1, 1888, E. M. Frank, complainant’s assignor, entered into a contract wifh F. F. Adams, defendant’s assignor, of which the following is a copy:
“This agreement, made and entered into the first day of March, A. D. 1888, by and between K M. Frank, party of the first part, and F. F. Adams, party of the second part, both of the county of Pan Diego, in the state of California, witnesseth:…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- St. Louis v. Knapp CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Conroy v. Oregon Construction Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885
- Whitman v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Callison v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Monmouth Inv. Co. v. MeansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Cole v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1900