Legal Opinion

Dollar v. Tapp

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1991No. 9015DC1096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s conclusions that she was given proper notice of plaintiffs’ request that the matter be set for trial and that she failed to show a meritorious defense to plaintiffs’ action. We agree with defendant and award a new trial.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to set aside the judgment and grant her a new trial pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 60(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. This subsection serves as a “grand reservoir of equitable power” by which a court may grant relief from a judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. v. Key Way Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Chaparral Supply v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Laroque v. LaroqueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. PYA/Monarch, Inc. v. Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Durham v. WooCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Hamby v. PROFILE PRODUCTS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Barnes v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Aoun & Cole, Inc. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API