Legal Opinion

Gill v. Gill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1955No. 18928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. “A court of equity shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the ordinary over the settlement of accounts of administrators.” Code § 113-2203. Equity will not interfere with the regular administration of estates at the instance of an heir except where there is danger of loss or other injury to his interest. Code § 37-403. “Where law and equity have concurrent jurisdiction, whichever first takes jurisdiction shall retain it, unless a good reason shall be given for the interference of equity.” Code § 37-122.

2. The petition fails to show that the available remedies at law are made*568q…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. HamrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Hoffman v. ChesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Salter v. SalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API