Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Volker v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 22, 1940Published

1Concurrence · EllisonEllison, J.

(concurring). — I concur in the result reached by the principal opinion but think the ruling in part III thereof is erroneous where it holds the respondent has failed properly to raise certain constitutional questions. I write this separate opinion solely because of the procedural importance of that point.

Relators seek by mandamus to compel the respondent treasurer of Jackson County to pay certain warrants issued b‘y the Board of Election Commissioners of Kansas City to a number of their assistants and' employees, under Sections 3, 89 and 92 of Laws of Mo. 1937, page 294, hereinafter called…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Leedy.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. West v. DiemerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Perkins v. BurksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Langan v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Field v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. State v. RectorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API