Legal Opinion
People v. Gilmore
Mount Vernon City Court
Decided April 13, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sam Eisenberg, J.
The defendant is charged with obscenity in the second degree, in violation of subdivision 1 of section 235.05 of the Penal Law, promoting prostitution in violation of section 230.40 of the Penal Law, and promoting the exposure of a female in violation of section 245.02 of the Penal Law.
*742The defendant has challenged the constitutionality of each of the sections of the Penal Law under which he is charged. Additionally, he has moved to suppress the use in evidence of certain films and a video recorder, seized from him without a warrant and without prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- People v. CraftRochester City Court · 1986
- United States v. MilaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.