Legal Opinion

De Andre Lamont Locklin v. Tammy Campbel

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 29, 2025No. 2:22-cv-06933Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-06933-SB-KES DE ANDRE LAMONT LOCKLIN, 7 8 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING THE v. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 9 RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. 10 TAMMY CAMPBEL, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 Respondent. 12 13 14 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 15 Habeas Corpus, the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of 16 the U.S. Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the 17 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API