De Andre Lamont Locklin v. Tammy Campbel
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-06933-SB-KES DE ANDRE LAMONT LOCKLIN, 7 8 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING THE v. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 9 RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. 10 TAMMY CAMPBEL, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 Respondent. 12 13 14 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 15 Habeas Corpus, the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of 16 the U.S. Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the 17 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.