Legal Opinion

Folmar v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1917No. 5787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

Appellant is prosecuting this appeal and complaining of the action of the trial court in sustaining a general demurrer and several special exceptions to his petition, and dismissing his suit. We copy, the following statement from appellees’ brief:

“This action was begun in the district court of Milam county by the appellant, J. T. F'ol-mar, as plaintiff, against the appellees Thomas & Sons, as principal, and A. J. Rhodes and J. A. Ely, as sureties, for damages alleged to have accrued to the appellant by reason of the failure of Thomas & Sons to fulfill and perform the obligations and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Parks v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pierson v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wilson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Dwyer v. City of BrenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Battle v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Kuklies v. ReinertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Mooney v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Johnson v. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Benton v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API