Steffens v. Steffens
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, District Judge.
Before the court are motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment filed, or joined in, by all defendants. Because the court finds that it must abstain under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, the defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted. All remaining motions are moot.
I
Jurisdiction.
Plaintiffs bring this civil rights case.under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
II
Statement of Issue.
Does this case present circumstances requiring abstention…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Willner v. FreyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Steckler Wayne & Love, PLLC v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024