Legal Opinion

Willner v. Frey

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 15, 2006No. 1:05CV1315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are landowners who lost a portion of their property in a state adverse possession litigation and now seek to recover that property by claiming in this case that Virginia’s law of adverse possession, as applied to them in the earlier state case, violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs’ effort to recover that property in this suit fails for a variety of reasons.

I

This dispute began over a piece of land located in Mason Neck, Virginia on the banks…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Field Auto City, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  2. Martin v. SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API