Legal Opinion

Hines v. Kinnison

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Yermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of trespass on the case brought by Kinnison and another. The declaration contains four counts. The first charges that the defendant, Hines, on, &c., at, &c., by his agent and servant, seized and took certain goods and chattels, to wit, 500 bushels of corn, the property of the plaintiffs, then and there standing upon the stalk in the field where the same had grown, &c., of great value, &c.; and afterwards, to wit, on, &c., at, &c., sold said goods and chattels, and converted the same to his owlr use. The fourth count is in trover. There was a demurrer to the declaration, but…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Culver v. SmartIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Heimer v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  3. White Water Valley Canal Co. v. DowIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  4. White Water Valley Canal Co. v. DowIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API