Legal Opinion

White Water Valley Canal Co. v. Dow

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1848Published

APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackford, J. —

'This was an action brought by Dow against the appellants.

The declaration states that the defendants, falsely and maliciously, and without any reasonable or probable cause, procured, from a certain justice of the peace, a writ of attachment, in the name of the state of Indiana, which writ commanded the constable, Bruning, one of the defendants, to summon one Boden, the captain of a certain canal boat of the plaintiff’s, to answer the White Water Valley Canal Company in a plea of debt under 100 dollars, and also to attach the boat and keep the same until payment of said demand;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Hines v. KinnisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API