Legal Opinion

McCullen v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 31, 2019No. 4:19-cv-00347Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JERAMIE A. MCCULLEN, ) o/b/o himself and a class of others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 19-00347-CV-W-ODS ) vs. ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED PETITION Pending is Defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Petition for Damages. Doc. #10. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND In April…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Stodghill v. Wellston School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API