Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dr. Joseph Gilbert, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Donald Johnson, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Movant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1979No. 77-1063Published

1Concurrence

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring:

Were the matter open for consideration, I would deny lawyers employed on a contingent fee the right to intervene in order to safeguard their fees, at least when they can protect their interest in some other way. A lawyer is entitled to protection, but he can usually safeguard the fee he has earned by some means other than intervention. In such cases “the disposition of the action [will not] as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest.” Rule 24(a)(2), F.R.C.P.

In Georgia, a lawyer employed on a contingent fee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Charles Alfred Gaines v. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Plotkin, Sapir & Bradley, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Dorsey v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Brookhaven Supply Co. v. RaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Haldi v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API