Legal Opinion

Bank of Hartford v. McNeal

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 4 Div. 986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

McNeal rented lands to B. S. Price for the year 1920. In December of that year McNeal sued out an attachment against Price seeking to enforce his landlord’s lien for a balance of $400 due to him for rent. The attachment was levied on crpps grown by the defendant during the year. Appellant bank interposed, claiming under a mortgage. On the trial of the right of property, thus set on foot, the bank claimed that plaintiff’s lien had been satisfied, and the claim suit, tried by the court without a jury, went off on this point; the court holding with the plaintiff in attachment.

It is shown in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. PrinceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. McDonald v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. McCoy v. PrinceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gorman-Gammill Seed & Dairy Supply Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API