Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harr v. Coolbaugh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1953No. Docket 90; Calendar 45,279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentSharpe, J.

In the instant case plaintiffs filed a hill of complaint, in the circuit court of Jackson county in which they seek an injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with a so-called right-of-way across the lands of defendants. Plaintiffs Harr own a piece of property in which they acquired title by deed in 1943. Defendants Wells own a piece of property directly east of the Harr property. The Wells acquired title to their property in 1948. Defendants Coolbaugh are the owners of a piece of property immediately east of the Wells’ property. The right-of-way in question is a strip of land 32…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Oldfield v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Burns v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Morgan v. MeuthMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Livonia Property Holdings, L.L.C. v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Beach v. Lima TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Nicholls v. HealyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API