Chaplin v. Milne

OPINION

STEPHEN F. PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on a promissory note executed by the Appellant and payable to the Appellee. Involved is the question of the application of the Parol Evidence Rule where a contemporaneous oral agreement is judicially admitted. The trial Court awarded judgment for the principal sum due plus interest and attorney’s fees, and a verdict was directed as to Appellant’s cross-action. We affirm the judgment of the trial Court.

The note was a printed form and absolute as to its terms with payment due six months from date of its execution. Appellant says that there…