Legal Opinion

Murg v. Barnsdall Nursing Home

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 2005No. 99,701PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINCHESTER, V.C.J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented for our review is whether the letters of special administration of appellant, Wilhelm Murg, Jr., Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Virginia Murg, Deceased, (hereinafter “Murg, Jr.,”) properly were issued, or whether his appointment was void ab initio (99,701) (Murg I). Our holding regarding appellant’s negligence claim against appellee, Barnsdall Nursing Home, (hereinafter “Barnsdall”) (99,367) (Murg II) hinges upon our determination of the validity of Murg, Jr.’s appointment as Special Personal Representative.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Daugherty v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Wabaunsee v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. GunterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re the Adoption of M.J.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. In re the Adoption of M.J.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Roth v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API