Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Melanie Hanson Johnson and Gerard Stanley Johnson, in Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Jacqueline N. Rau

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1982No. 82-1181, 82-1207Published

1DissentHeaney, Circuit Judge

The majority decision is very narrow, holding that the mandatory class action certified by the court below violates the Anti-Injunction Act. It is clear, as the majority recognizes, that the Act would not be contravened by an opt-out class action. On remand, the district court should consider whether such an opt-out class is appropriate.

I dissent, nonetheless, because I believe that the district court’s mandatory class action, if slightly modified, would be proper. We should modify the district court’s order by permitting punitive damage claims to be settled and by providing that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API